Travel Information: Guidebooks vs. the Web

Seth Kugel, the Frugal Traveler blogger for the New York Times, debates the use of a guidebook versus the Internet for trip planning and information in a recent article.

The article was in response to a colleague who said he’d pretty much forgotten that guidebooks exist. Kugel sets out to learn for himself by searching for information about Hungary, a country he said he knew nothing about.

Starting out with a brand new guidebook, he compares it to a myriad of travel- and dining-related websites, starting with LonelyPlanet.com, which had published his guidebook. He then wades through at least seven other sites along with Hungarian sites in English.

Kugel’s conclusion:

It may sound like the web was blowing away my guidebook — but not so fast. Literally: It’s not so fast. Marking up the guidebook took a few hours and came to an obvious end (the last page). But I could have sifted through these sites forever. For some people, that’s fine: it’s been shown that planning a trip actually makes us happier than the trip itself. But choice can be paralyzing. For those who want the deciding done for them, a trusted guidebook brand wins, at least in planning an agenda.

He cites three way in which the guidebook beats the web: (1) better maps, (2) information that may not be available online, (3) simple convenience without a steep learning curve.

Indeed, The Intrepid Traveler’s newest guidebook, Universal Orlando 2014: The Ultimate Guide to the Ultimate Theme Park Adventure, has everything you need for your Universal trip. And, yes, it doesn’t run out of batteries.

 

This article was posted in Blog and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments with the RSS feed for this post. Post a Comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is kept private. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>